June 10, 2013
Post written by Sharon Milgram, Director of The Office of Intramural Training & Education.
One of the fun things I get to do as part of my job directing the Office of Intramural Training & Education, is to give talks on the NIH campus and at universities across the United States. Students ask me all types of questions about my career; how a physical therapist became a cell biologist, what I like about my previous faculty job and my current administrative job, what I don’t like, what I look for when I hire new employees, etc. One question always gets asked– what I would do differently if I could do it all over again. I always give the same response – “I would have learned more about leadership and management earlier in my career”.
Yes, I got my faculty job based on my science — the papers I published, the grants I wrote, and the way I communicated enthusiasm for protein trafficking. But, I was successful in that job because of the hard work and dedication of the many students and staff who worked with me. When I communicated my expectations clearly and dealt with issues calmly and up-front, my lab ran more smoothly and I got more work done. Therefore, my success depended on my science skills AND my management/leadership skills. The same is true now in a completely different setting. My success in the OITE depends on others doing their best work. It is critical that I work continuously on my management and leadership skills.
There is broad agreement that scientists must develop strong interpersonal skills to do effective team science and to transition from training to management positions (at and away from the bench). Yet, we don’t always find the time to be trained in these areas. Many students, postdocs and mentors find little value in “soft skills” training. They believe that a successful career in science is determined predominantly by publications, patents, funding, etc. However, the book Lab Dynamics (Cohen and Cohen)* surveyed scientists and found that nearly two-thirds reported that interpersonal conflict had hampered progress on a scientific project between 1-5 times in their career. Furthermore, many of our alumni share that managing and leading a team is one of the earliest challenges they face.
To help you start developing your management and leadership skills, the OITE has developed the “Workplace Dynamics” series. The workshops focus on: 1) increased awareness of self and others using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator®; 2) communication styles and influencing others; 3) conflict dynamics; 4) team theory; and 5) diversity training. Our goal is to help you gain greater self-awareness and an appreciation that others may approach conflict and group work differently. We hope that by providing a language to discuss these differences, you will be better able to manage yourself and work across differences in the workplace. We use examples that resonate with scientists and combine didactic material with interactive group work. We know that trainees appreciate the interactive group work, but that they also like helpful resources they can access from home. I have listed some of these resources at the bottom of this post in the hopes that readers not currently at NIH can benefit from the reading the material as they seek similar programs on their campuses. Those of you currently at NIH – summer interns, postbacs, grad students, postdocs, clinical and research fellows – take advantage of these workshops now. The Summer/Fall Workplace Dynamics series starts in June. Find our more and register here.
References:
Lab Dynamics: Management Skills for Scientists, Cohen and Cohen (2005) New York: Cold Spring Harbor Press
MBTI:
http://www.myersbriggs.org/
Type Talk at Work (Revised): How the 16 Personality Types Determine Your Success on the Job by Otto Kroeger, Janet M. Thuesen and Hile Rutledge (2002) Delta
Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (Tuxedo NY: Xicom, 1974) and CPP TKI product page
Eckerd College Center for Conflict Dynamics:
http://www.conflictdynamics.org/
Becoming a Conflict Competent Leader: How You and Your Organization Can Manage Conflict Effectively by Craig E. Runde and Tim A. Flanagan (2006) Jossey-Bass
Crucial Confrontations by Kerry Patterson, Joseph Grenny, Ron McMillan and Al Switzler (2004) McGraw-Hill
Feedback That Works: How to Build and Deliver Your Message, CCL, 2000
Emotional Intelligence: 10th Anniversary Edition; Why It Can Matter More Than IQ by Daniel Goleman (2006), Bantam
Working with Emotional Intelligence by Daniel Goleman (2000) Bantam
Readings for Diversity and Social Justice, Third Edition by Maurianne Adams, Warren Blumenfeld, Carmelita Castaneda and Heather W. Hackman (2013) Routledge
1 Comment |
Academic careers, Careers in science, Careers in the U.S. government, Careers outside of the academy, Graduate or professional school, Graduate School, Job search, Leadership, Management, Negotiating, OITE news, Professional development, Self-assessment, Stress management, Teamwork, Uncategorized | Tagged: academic jobs, career options for scientists, careers in science, job search, job search assistance, leadership, Management, networking, NIH, OITE, professional development, relationships, self-assessment, stress management, work-life balance |
Permalink
Posted by Phil Ryan
May 20, 2013
Do you need to find a job in a geographically limited area far from your current location? Maybe your significant other just found a dream job, or maybe you just always wanted to live in Seattle, WA – whatever the reason, a remote and geographically limited job search poses a distinct set of challenges that require some strategizing to overcome. Here are a few thoughts that may help from a person who recently was searching for a job in Dallas, TX, while living in Bethesda, MD. These tips are useful in any job search, but particularly for conducting a remote search.
Begin the search early. Job options tend to be reduced when they are limited by geography. Imposing boundaries on the location means relying on fewer potential employers. The more time you allow for finding a job, the better.
Use your network. Your network should be your first resource in a remote job search. Know the histories of the people in your network, and keep up with their current locations. Ask people currently or historically linked to the area for suggested companies or connections. Some of your contacts may work for a company with an office in that location and may be willing to send out feelers on your behalf. Always ask permission before using a contact’s name or, even better, ask them to provide an introduction.
Do not limit yourself to professional contacts. Talk to friends, alumni associations, volunteer organizations, members of your religious institute, or anywhere else you may find an unexpected lead. If you are a member of a professional or volunteer organization, contact the local chapters to make some connections. Seek local people at conferences. Make your job search as widely known as possible – the more exposure the better. Conducting a secretive job search poses more of a challenge, but typically you can advertise pretty broadly without you current boss finding out.
Use job Sites. Job sites will be your friend. Most career sites filter searches to a specific area or radius around an area. Check out the state labor department for local search engines. The City of Dallas website had links to six local search engines.
Know your business. If you are looking for an academic job, search all the universities. For me, looking for a job in science policy in Dallas meant searching anywhere that might have a policy/government relations office, like non-profit organizations and universities. After finding some leads, go back to your network and look for the connections. Cold e-mails to directors or assistant directors (managers) located in offices of interest can end up in future leads or even a job. So don’t be afraid to write them a note. None of the offices I contacted were hiring at the time, but I continued to receive several leads from the people I contacted with in those initial cold e-mails.
Be flexible. Compromising a little on the job you are seeking may go a long way towards finding a position. As a person recently preparing for a science policy career in Washington, DC, where policy jobs are plentiful, now moving to Dallas, TX, where science policy jobs are next to non-existent, I had to broaden my search to jobs with similar skills requirements and career goals. After some considerable research, I found a job in the communications office of a local university requiring many of the same skills and tasks that I enjoyed in science policy.
To recap: start early, use your network heavily, use search engines wisely, cold call companies of interest, and use your network even more.
What are your suggestions or experiences for a remote job search?
Leave a Comment » |
Academic careers, Careers in science, Careers in the U.S. government, Careers outside of the academy, Informational Interview, Interviewing, Job search, Networking, OITE news, Professional development, Science careers, Teamwork, Time management | Tagged: academic jobs, career options for scientists, careers in science, Informational Interview, interview, Interviewing, interviews, job search, job search assistance, LinkedIn, negotiating, networking, NIH, OITE, overcoming obstacles, professional development, skills, time management |
Permalink
Posted by Phil Ryan
May 13, 2013
Are you starting to think about finding the perfect postdoc position?
First, you need to decide whether you need to do a postdoc at all. Depending on your career aspirations, a postdoc may only serve to delay your entry into your desired career or even hinder your ability to get started doing what you really want to do. However, that is another post for another time.
You have decided that a postdoc is the next step, so here are some key elements to consider:
Advisor: Many people think that the advisor’s reputation is the only thing to consider but we argue that to have a good postdoc experience you need to make sure that you and your advisor are compatible. Here are some things to look for:
- Mentoring style: We all say we want autonomy as a postdoc, but the level of autonomy really can differ. Some advisors you may never see and getting their attention to discuss data is difficult. Others are more hands on and stop by multiple times a day to discuss experiments, techniques, data, etc. Determine your preference in this spectrum.
- Record: Understand where they publish. How stable is their funding? You should also know if they have expectation that you will write for your own funding or not. Consider the pros and cons of both tenured and tenure-track investigators (feel free to discuss this is the comment section).
- Your Career: Pick an advisor that will support your career, no matter what you want to do next. A good sign is if they know where former trainees work and are still in contact. Do they have a strong network that you can tap into as you look for your next position?
Project: You will want to know the project(s) you will be working on and how much you get to define it. Is it really your project, or your boss’s project where you are doing the work? Also, does the project have built-in skills development for you to learn new techniques and write grants? Is it interesting to you?
Labmates: Do you like small labs that feel like family, or large labs with lots of people with differing expertise? You will want to ask the current lab members about the work culture, work-life balance and the average length of a postdoc in the lab and where past members have gone after leaving. These are the people you will spend a large portion of your time with, so getting the right fit is key to your overall happiness.
Institution: Does the institution where the lab is based have career support in the form of a postdoc office or association? You will also want to know the standard pay scale and benefits for postdocs and whether that is negotiable. Also, don’t forget about your science and determine if the institution has facilities, such as core groups, that will support your research.
Location: Yes, it does matter. For some, being in a big city is the only way to truly live. For others, all that noise and commotion is too much to handle. If you have a family (or are hoping to start one), their needs are important to consider as well. Also, remember that your income needs to be considered with in the context of the cost of living for that area.
These are just a few key elements to consider. Feel free to add a comment discussing other considerations when choosing the perfect postdoc.
2 Comments |
Academic careers, Careers in science, Careers in the U.S. government, Graduate or professional school, Job search, Networking, Professional development, Science careers | Tagged: academic jobs, career options for scientists, careers in science, Interviewing, job search, job search assistance, mentor, networking, NIH, OITE, postdoc, professional development, science careers |
Permalink
Posted by Phil Ryan
May 6, 2013
Research is your top priority as a graduate student or postdoc. That, coupled with your passion for science, may drive you to devote every waking moment to your research. You love discovery. You need to publish. However, regardless of your career aspirations, your regular routine may benefit from a slight change of pace. Maybe there is a certain career you’ve always wanted to explore or skill set you’ve wanted to develop. Participating in activities outside of lab can help you learn a lot about yourself, forge meaningful networks, and potentially guide your future career path.
Earlier, we discussed serving on the career symposium committee and how to make the most out of such opportunities. Other activities may range from writing an article for a newsletter, organizing a monthly seminar series or social event, teaching a course or leading a journal club, taking the initiative to start a new interest group, or serving as a co-chair of a postdoc or graduate student association (such as FelCom or the Graduate Student Council). There is a variety of opportunities with a range of time commitments to explore.
Choose the right moment, but make the time: Develop a comfortable balance between your research and activities, and never overextend yourself. For both graduate students and postdocs, the “middle-years” of your fellowships are generally good times to participate. Don’t get heavily involved when just starting your fellowship or when your lab is in the midst of preparing for a sensitive event like a grant deadline or a BSC review. For grad students, avoid periods of time when you have a high level of academic responsibilities. Perhaps it feels like there is no perfect time or personal/family commitments make it difficult to participate in events that extend into the evening. Though, let’s say you devote 5% of the “standard” 40 hour work to such career-enhancing activities. That’s 2 hours a week! Look at your schedule from that perspective and determine how you can find the time.
Do the job right or don’t do it at all: Don’t participate in an activity if you are just looking to add a line to your CV, and don’t agree to take a role if you are not truly enthusiastic about it. That line on your CV alone won’t do or say anything if you can’t support it by explaining the transferrable skills that you may have acquired. Make sure you clearly understand what is expected for each one before you volunteer. If you don’t fulfill your responsibilities, it could irreparably damage your reputation with colleagues and staff. Give plenty of warning if you have to respectfully miss a meeting or withdraw from an activity. Again, research is your top priority and everyone understands if extenuating circumstances arise.
Taking the next step: Talk to your mentor about your participation in any activities during normal working hours. If your mentor isn’t too enthusiastic about your participating in a certain activity, start with an event that doesn’t take up much time. Explain to your mentor how these activities can be important for your future career path and show, specifically, how small the time commitment really is for many cases. Show through experience that these activities are not interfering with your ability to get new data or proceed with your research.
The NIH (or your university) is a great place to explore your skills and interests both in and out of the lab. If you choose the right activity, plan ahead and manage your time efficiently, you can significantly enrich your experience here.
Leave a Comment » |
Careers in science, Careers outside of the academy, Graduate or professional school, Professional development, Science careers, Teamwork, Time management | Tagged: career, career options in science, networking, professional development, skills, time management |
Permalink
Posted by loriconlan
February 25, 2013
You found an awesome job posting or graduate program, crafted the perfect curriculum vitae, and created a cover letter capable of convincing the staunchest of holdouts that you are a vital addition to their team. The only problem is you remembered to attach your resume after pressing send on your cover letter e-mail. Forgotten attachments happen to everyone, but the job application process is where you are supposed to distinguish yourself as a better candidate than everyone else. So – now what?
Unlike many career advice searches on the internet, there are not a lot of professional sites with comments on forgotten attachments. The obvious action requires you to send the forgotten materials; otherwise there is no chance for success. The real question remains: How do provide the missing information while saving face?
Do you apologize for the mistake? Do you try to act as if it never happened? The best route is to resend the same e-mail (with the attachment this time) with a comment in the title about the inclusion. Do not write a long, apologetic paragraph about forgetting the attachment. This reaction makes a big deal out of a common mistake and can make you seem insecure. At the same time you need to say something to differentiate the new e-mail from the old one so the hiring manager or principal investigator does not think you are spamming them. One postdoc recently forgot to attach their resume to a cold call e-mail and recovered by simply sending the same e-mail entitled “Employment inquiry at blah with attached resume”, and received a positive response.
For the most part, human resources and principal investigators tend to be pretty forgiving. Just keep in mind they are judging you at every interaction – this can be a time to show your ability to recover gracefully from a difficult situation.
Mistakes made during the application process may come back to haunt you during the interview. Keep in mind that if you are being interviewed that the company/ principal investigator thinks you might be a good fit for them. Do not be the one to bring up a past mistake. Do not give them a reason to deny you the position. Only talk about a past error from your application process if they ask about it. Be prepared with an answer that puts you in a positive light, not something like you were too busy applying to their competitor and forgot the attachment to them.
Of course, the better strategy is to remember the attachment. Make a list of things, mentally or written down, that you always check before submitting any application. Some items to include can be; properly addressing the cover letter, attaching the required documentation, filling in the subject line, and using spell check (spell check will not reliably catch names). Leave a comment with other items you think the email proof-reading list should include.
1 Comment |
Careers in science, Informational Interview, Interviewing, Job search, Resumes and CVs | Tagged: career, cover letters, CVs, Informational Interview, job search, job search assistance, overcoming obstacles, professional development, resumes |
Permalink
Posted by loriconlan
February 19, 2013
Last week at the NIH, Daniel Goleman delivered a talk about Emotional Intelligence and how it influences leadership. The premise of Emotional Intelligence is that understanding your emotions, the emotions of others, and how the two interact allows us to be more successful and happier.
Emotional Intelligence suggests that to be successful the following traits are important:
- Self awareness: being able to assess and understand your emotions and having self-confidence
- Social awareness: having empathy, organizational awareness and service orientation
- Self-management: having emotional self-control, adaptability, initiative and optimism
- Relationship management: developing others, influence, providing inspiration, conflict management and teamwork
While that all seems well and good, we often hear that scientists lack these types of people skills. The urban myth is that as long as you are smart enough you can succeed, without having to worry about how you interact with others. But, there is no researcher that operates in a vacuum—especially today in the word of team science and collaboration.
So, how do you become more aware about these topics, and use them to become more successful?
- Reflect on how you respond to stressors. Are there particular things that you know are hot buttons for you? In the topics that cause you stress, are there any similarities? What happens? Be detailed when you think of these; who is involved, what do you say (or not say), what is the outcome? What do you wish you would have done or said?
- Practice different responses. One way to get a better response is to practice it, even if it does not feel “right”. Think about this as writing with your non-dominant hand. It is possible, but it takes practice to make it legible. Is there a time when you saw someone else handle a situation well, what can you take from that challenge you witnessed? When you reflected on a situation did you see another response that would have been better?
- Understand the other person’s position. This is not to say that you agree, but that you see the problem from their perspective. How can you use that information to build a working relationship?
- Breath. By focusing on your breath you can help reduce stress. This is also called Mindfulness.
There is no passive solution to understanding these topics, you have to practice. We teach techniques in OITE leadership and management courses. Workplace Dynamics covers understanding yourself and others and our Management Bootcamp has a whole session on working with Emotional Intelligence. We have even started to present these topics at national meetings such as Experimental Biology.
If you are an NIHer, you can Watch Daniel Goleman’s talk from last week. If you want other information on Emotional Intelligence check out the book list on sites such as Amazon or from your local library.
Research the topic, and learn to be more successful in science by embracing that people are part of our success.
Leave a Comment » |
Professional development, Self-assessment, Stress management | Tagged: adversity, overcoming obstacles, professional development, self-assessment, stress management |
Permalink
Posted by loriconlan
February 11, 2013
One of the most common forms of professional communication is the ‘Presentation.’ No matter what career you have – professor, researcher, science policy analyst, CEO of a company – chances are you will have to prepare and deliver professional presentations. In fact, you probably give presentations regularly already – for lab meeting, at professional conferences, for your thesis proposal, or for your job interview. However, no matter why you are giving your talk, the goal is the same: Communicating and sharing information with your audience. Because of this, there are some simple principles that any talk should have – and you can use these are the building blocks of any presentation you prepare.
- Have a story: Every talk has a story. Just like any story – from a book or a movie – no one remembers every detail, but just the major events. Your goal is to construct your presentation so that people leave remembering the major points. Start by asking yourself, “What are the ‘major events’ your audience should know about your story? If they have 5 minutes to summarize my talk, what is it I want them to be able to say?”
- Plan your Transitions: Successful presentations are about successful transitions. Transitions occur throughout your talk. There is a transition from your introduction to your first major point. Another transition occurs when you move to the next point. Transitions also occur from slide to slide. If you understand the story you are trying to tell, then having smooth transitions is easier. When you are practicing your talk, think about how you will lead your audience from one point to the other. For example, once you complete your specific aims of your experiments, your audience should know (and you should too) that the next major point to discuss is the methods used, in only enough detail for them to understand what comes afterwards – highlights from the results.
- You are the Presentation, not the Slides: With Powerpoint and other presentation applications today, most people prepare slides to go with their talk. While this is not a bad thing, the slides should not be the focus of your story. Filling your slides with the verbatim text of your presentation bores your audience, invites them to read ahead (and by doing so, stop listening to you), and in the ends, makes them wonder why you could not have just written the talk and handed it to them before hand. You are the presentation: You tell the story, you decide what the important aspects to emphasize are, and you direct the audience’s attention to interesting features of graphs and figures. Your slides are tools and landmarks that help you stay on track, and remind you what major point you wanted to make at that time. Perhaps outline your story on a piece of paper, and then create your slides to help support your story.
Here is a recent videocast of a workshop that the OITE did on Talking Science: Designing and Delivering Successful Oral Presentations
No matter what type of talk you need to give, before you start, think first about your story, how you will transition from major point to major point (and from slide to slide), and do not rely upon you slides to tell your story. With these basics you can create any great talk!
Leave a Comment » |
Academic careers, Careers in science, Professional development, Uncategorized | Tagged: academic jobs, Interviewing, professional development, science, skills |
Permalink
Posted by loriconlan
February 4, 2013
The OITE blog has dedicated this year to being Skilled and Competent. Keeping with that theme, in February you should assess your current skill set and compare it to your career goals. What skills will you need to achieve your goals? Which skills do you already posses and which do you need to improve? How do you go about improving those skills? It can all seem a little overwhelming, so it helps to create a plan. When it comes to creating career plans, there is not better tool than the Individual Development Plan, or IDP.
We’ve blogged about IDPs before, and why they are good ideas. IDPs have been used by private and government organizations for years. Human Resource managers realized that there often was a disconnect between an employee’s skill set and his/her career goals. The IDP was used to help employees determine their career aspirations, assess their skills, and set goals to help them become more competent and successful. In 2002 the Federation of American Societies of Experimental Biology (FASEB) introduced IDPs to scientists, by creating an IDP template geared toward postdoctoral scholars. Since then IDPs have grown in popularity for helping young scientists achieve their career goals.
There are two very good options you can use to create your own IDP. You can download the FASEB template from the OITE website. There is also a new, free, online resources on the Science website, called myIDP, which was written by career experts at UC-San Francisco, the Medical College of Wisconsin, and FASEB (Editor’s note: While we suggest you investigate both the FASEB IDP template and myIDP to see if these tools work for you, we are not endorsing FASEB, AAAS, nor myIDP). No matter which tool you use, you will need to set aside some time to think seriously about your career ambitions, honestly asses your current skills and abilities, and then make time to create short- and long-term goals.
Both the FASEB template and myIDP were written for advanced graduate students and postdoctoral fellows, but the concepts and exercises can be used by anyone, at any career stage. For those of you in the earlier stages of your science career training, when the IDP ask postdocs about their interest in pursuing, say, a faculty position or industry research, you need to frame the question for your career stage. It might be more appropriate for you to compare medical school, dental school, graduate school, or entering the workforce directly. The specific goal of the IDP is to create a career plan that is customized for you – remember, it is an Individual Development Plan.
The most important thing to remember is to enlist the help of a mentor, or if you are a trainee in the NIH intramural research program you can also take advantage of the OITE Career Services center, when developing your IDP. While you need to be the driving force behind your IDP, you also need to take advantage of the resources to help you focus your efforts, and get feedback on your progress. With an IDP, you can then spend the rest of the year becoming competent in the skills needed to fulfill your career goals.
Leave a Comment » |
Professional development, Self-assessment | Tagged: Career Skills, Communication Skills, IDP, Individual development plans, Leadership & Management Skills, professional development, self-assessment, Teaching & Mentoring Skills |
Permalink
Posted by garthfowler
December 11, 2012
If you’ve been following the OITE blog this year, you know that in the start of 2012 we decided to help you make a Calendar for Career Success. We picked topics, and blogged about them, giving you advice (and sometimes challenges) each month to help you drive your career. In short, we wanted 2012 to be the ‘Year for Your Career.’
And given that it is December, it is time to sit back and reminisce about the past year – because that is what everyone does in December, right? Some of the things we talked about this year included having conversations about your career goals. Not just you and your friends talking about your dream job over lunch, but a directed conversation with your PI or a career counselor. These can be tough – but worthwhile. They help you take control of your career – set a plan, and work with people that have experience and knowledge to help you create a successful career plan.
And sometimes we made you work – pulling together resources to create your job application, practicing your interviewing skills. Because your career plan is not just a theory or a timeline on a piece of paper, but something you engage in: Thinking critically about your resume or CV, assessing your skills and abilities, and taking advantage of resources and opportunities to strengthen your career.
If you followed our career calendar for 2012 (you can find it here) then congratulations! You deserve a good pat on the back. Even if you are in your same job now (because you weren’t on the job market in 2012) or not (despite your best efforts you still haven’t moved on to your dream job), actively working on your career each month is a great achievement. Even people in their ‘dream’ job constantly engage in making their career a ‘priority.’ They attend conferences and network with colleagues; they think about how to either gain new skills or apply the ones they have to new questions or problems. For these people, focus is on making their current job more interesting or more challenging, not on getting a new one.
But why should 2012 be the only “Year of Your Career?” The answer: No reason. Every year can be your career year. And if you weren’t reading our blog in January of 2012 (shame on you, by the way), then there is no reason not to start working on our calendar in January 2013. And if you’ve been with us all year long, you can continue to actively work on your career – whether you want to just be better at your current job, or get a new one.
In short, your career is an activity, not a thing. And by setting up a career calendar, and sticking to it, you’ve decided that your career is a priority, and actively engage in having your dream career!
Leave a Comment » |
Careers in science, Job search, Networking, Professional development, Science careers | Tagged: adversity, career options for scientists, careers in science, job search, OITE, professional development |
Permalink
Posted by loriconlan
November 26, 2012
You have a new job! (or hope to soon). Here are some tips to make the transition to your new position successful and as easy as possible.
First, remember that transitions are always tough. While you are likely very excited about a new position, the transition can be overwhelming, especially if you are moving to a new location. You are closing out a chapter in your life that has likely lasted between two and five years (or more). You are saying goodbye to friends and colleagues and disrupting an established routine—so some anxiety is totally normal.
Finish strong and leave your current job on a positive note. Finish those last minute experiments, organize those freezer boxes, clean your personal spaces (bench, desk, etc), train other people in the group on what you do, and organize/clean/save important computer files and emails. This always seems to take longer than you think it should, and many of us have put this off to the last minute and then scrambled to finish everything before we walk out the door. Also, decide how many of those last minute experiments can honestly be done before you leave. Someone else in the lab can likely perform the rest after you leave.
Make sure you take time to say goodbye to people. Things can be chaotic as you transition, and sometimes we forget the people. Schedule enough time to say goodbye (without over-scheduling so that you are going crazy trying to keep your social calendar in check).
If your new job requires you to move, ask the organization you are moving to for relocation help. Even if this will just be a colleague that will point you in the right direction for good neighborhoods, childcare, restaurants, etc. Finding a good place to live will make the transition much easier. You can even search the alumni databases or Linkedin to find other people who are in that location to get guidance.
Make a plan for your arrival at your new job. Some recommend a 90 day plan of what you would like to get done. A good book on is The First 90 Days, by Michael Watkins. Also, if you are heading to an academic appointment, you may want to read Making the Right Moves (published by HHMI), and At the Helm by Kathy Barker. Create a summary and overview of your position, as you see it. Then make a list of goals that you should (and can) complete in your first 30, 60, and 90 days. In this, also mention the assumptions that you have and any required resources needed in order to make this happen. This gives you some good guidelines and goals as you move into a new position with many other unknowns.
Build a good reputation with both your new boss and your new coworkers. Be part of the team. Volunteer to tackle doable projects. Ask your co-workers on the best places for lunch and coffee (and even invite them to share in a cup of coffee with you). Don’t try to integrate too quickly into every conversation. Remember, these people have built a bond and you will need time to really understand all of the nuances of the relationships.
Finally, make sure to take some time for your own work-life balance. Finding new places in the community is a great way to find a new support system, to gain friends and to make this transition less lonely.
So good luck!!! And keep in touch…..your transition now makes a terrific success story for those coming through the ranks behind you!
Leave a Comment » |
Academic careers, Careers in science, Careers in the U.S. government, Careers outside of the academy, Educational Science, Job search, Networking, OITE news, Professional development, Self-assessment, Stress management, Teamwork, Work/life Balance | Tagged: academic jobs, career, career options for scientists, job search, job search assistance, LinkedIn, negotiating, networking, NIH, OITE, overcoming obstacles, professional development, relationships, self-assessment, stress management, work-life balance, work/life balance |
Permalink
Posted by Phil Ryan